Natech Accident
DISCLAIMER: The Joint Research Centre does not guarantee the accuracy and completeness of the data in eNatech. It also reserves the right to cancel or change records without prior notification.
Type
Natech Accident
Date
2007/07/01
Status
Published

Units Involved

  1. Name
    Above-ground tanks
    Type
    Storage: Atmospheric storage tank
    Description
    These tanks are used for the storage of crude oil and its fractions.

    The refinery is located just inside a flood levee adjacent to the Verdigris River. At the time of the release, the river's water level exceeded the levee by 1.2m (3.9 feet) and topped the secondary containment dykes surrounding the storage tank area.
  2. Name
    Coke fine storage
    Type
    Storage: Unknown
    Description
    Coke fines were used and hence stored at the refinery.
  3. Name
    Drainage system
    Type
    Other: Waste disposal

Event Sequences

  1. Name
    Oil Spill
    Unit
    1. Above-ground tanks
    Description
    Tank 8010 was affected by the oil spill and an estimated 305 m3 (1,919 barrels) of crude oil were released from it into the Verdigris River.

    The Kansas Department of Health and Environment reported that a valve was not closed by plant employees during the emergency shutdown. Crude oil continued to be pumped from a tank at a higher elevation into Tank 8010 which eventually overflowed.

    The company indicated that due to the imminent flood they were trying to partially fill oil tanks to keep them from floating away.
    Substances Involved
    1. Name
      Crude oil
      Involved Quantity
      305 m³
    Initiating EventCritical EventMajor Event
    -
    Release: Release due to overflow
    Contributing Factors
    Organisational: Isolation of equipment / system: Unavailable
    One valve was not closed, because the plant workers mistakenly believed to have more time to shut down the refinery before the water arrived. A plant spokesman contends that this was due to a malfunctioning flood gauge upstream on the Verdigris River. Other warnings had been issued on that day by the National Weather Service that indicated that record flooding was imminent.
    Measure: Containment system (e.g. walls, dikes, enclosed room): Inadequate
    Due to the river flood the secondary containment dykes around the tanks were also flooded. Therefore, the release of crude oil from the tank could not be contained in the dyke.
    Release: Liquid release to water body
    Dispersion: Substance in / on water
    The oil dispersed in the Verdigris river
  2. Name
    Coke fine release
    Unit
    2. Coke fine storage
    Description
    Coke fines were released from the refinery, suspended in the flood waters and deposited in the town of Coffeyville.
    Initiating EventCritical EventMajor Event
    -
    Release: Release due to overflow
    Coke fines were stored at the refinery in an open pile. During flooding they were released from the refinery and suspended in the flood waters.
    Dispersion: Substance in / on ground
    The coke fines carried with the floodwaters were deposited in the town of Coffeyville.
  3. Name
    Displacement of tanks
    Unit
    1. Above-ground tanks
    Description
    Several of the above-ground storage tanks were observed to have shifted off of their foundations within the flooded, diked areas due to the flood waters.

    An additional 15 m3 (4,000 gallons) of crude oil fractions and 19 m3 (5,000 gallons) of diesel oil were also reported to have been discharged into the floodwaters although the source of these releases is not specified.
    Substances Involved
    1. Name
      Crude oil fractions
      Involved Quantity
      15 m³
    2. Name
      Diesel oil
      Involved Quantity
      19 m³
    Initiating EventCritical EventMajor Event
    Natural Hazard: Floating off of storage tanks / equipment
    Release: Liquid release to water body
    Although there is no detailed information on releases from the displaced tanks, it is likely that small spills occurred when the floodwaters displaced them. This would also explain the reported releases of diesel oil and crude oil fractions.
    Dispersion: Substance in / on water
  4. Name
    Discharge from waste disposal system
    Unit
    3. Drainage system
    Description
    The drainage system flooded, releasing oily water.
    Initiating EventCritical EventMajor Event
    Natural Hazard: Floating oil in drainage systems due to inundation
    Release: Liquid release to water body
    Dispersion: Substance in / on water

Emergency Response

Response Planning
Emergency response plan takes Natech events into consideration: Yes
Emergency response plan is sufficient in taking Natech events into consideration: No
Response Planning Activities
The refinery said that in preparation for the flood it was partially filling oil tanks to keep them from floating away.

The emergency response plan was activated and the refinery was shut down. However, instead of the 24 hours usually required to secure the plant, staff only had 5-6 hours before they had to evacuate due to the flood.
Difficulties in Response to the Natural Hazard
Insufficient personnel and equipment to respond to both emergencies: Yes
Natech event prevents access of personnel to natural hazard affected area: No
Natech event prevents efficient operation of personnel in the natural hazard affected area: No
Difficulties in Response to the Natech Event
Insufficient personnel and equipment to respond to both emergencies: Yes
Damage to lifelines (e.g. water, power, communication, transportation): Yes
Response Teams and Equipment Involved
Regional / national hazmat teams
Sheltering and Evacuation due to the Natech event
  • On-site evacuation
  • Off-site evacuation

Consequences

Environmental Zones Impacted
  • Inland (e.g. grassland, cropland, forest)
  • Freshwater (e.g. pond, lake, stream)
Environmental Impacts
Water sampling downstream of the refinery and in the immediate area of the City of Coffeyville conducted by the EPA and the company (CRRM) showed the presence of benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene, xylene, and naphthalene which are common constituents of oil. Air-quality samples in the City of Coffeyville by EPA and CRRM did not indicate the presence of volatile organic compounds at a level of concern.
Down-time of the Facility
865 hour(s)
Economic Impacts
The gross costs associated with the repair of, and other matters relating to the damage to the company’s facilities and with third party and property damage remediation incurred due to the crude oil discharge have been reported in 2008 as approximately 153.6 million USD.
Built-up Areas Impacted
  • Residential areas (e.g. housings, hotels)
  • Commercial areas (e.g. offices, shops)
Community Disruption
Over 300 houses were affected by the oil and the flooding.

The oil-polluted waters entered farmland, and farmers were advised to mow down their crop and keep cattle off the land.

Remedial Activities

Decontamination Activities
With the help of the US Coast Guard (Atlantic Strike Team), the company deployed overall 2,500m (8000 feet) of boom and 6 boats in the frame of the Oil Spill Response Contract. The affected area was declared off-limits with the National Guard manning its perimeter.
Remediation Activities
The refinery carried out actions to contain and collect oil, oiled debris, and sorbent materials on the river and creeks. It also performed soil remediation in residential areas. Overall, these activities took about 10 months.

CRRM carried out house buyouts from affected property owners (both residential and commercial).

Affected commercial buildings were remediated or purchased by the company for demolition (370 properties were demolished).
Restoration Activities
In 2008/2009 final grading and reseeding of property now owned by the company was conduction. This completed the on-site remedial actions.

Lessons Learned

Lessons Learned on Organisational Aspects
Early flood warning is important to give refinery operators the necessary time to properly shut down and secure processes and equipment.
ID: 52, Created: Vincenzo ARCIDIACONO, 2014-09-17 18:10:19 – Last Updated: Amos NECCI, 2021-03-17 17:09:59

Attachments

NoDescriptionFile Size
1.2007 Flood and Crude Oil Discharge for CVR_ENERGY_INC (CVI) 75.51KB
2.Coffeyville Refinery Resources and Marketing Oil Spill - EPA 3.21MB
3.Eastman versus CRRM 136.04KB
4.EPA CRRM Consent Agreement 1.30MB
5.International Oil Spill Conference MILEY 64.75KB
6.The Joplin Globe - Kansas State 1.46MB
7.The Wichita Eagle - Coffeyville remediation 1.05MB