Natech Accident
DISCLAIMER: The Joint Research Centre does not guarantee the accuracy and completeness of the data in eNatech. It also reserves the right to cancel or change records without prior notification.
Type
Natech Accident
Date
1989/09/20
Status
Published

Units Involved

  1. Name
    Tank Farm
    Type
    Storage: Atmospheric storage tank
    Description
    Storage tanks containing crude oil and No. 6 fuel oil. Five were 100,000-barrel storage tanks.

Event Sequences

  1. Name
    Heavy damage of tanks
    Unit
    1. Tank Farm
    Description
    The hurricane destroyed five large oil storage tanks and severely damaged several others at the Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corporation (HOVIC) refinery, on the south coast of St. Croix. 10,000 barrels were released, but approximately 9,000 barrels were contained within earthen berms on the facility's grounds. A small portion of the leaked oil managed to find its way to the HOVIC tanker harbor.
    Substances Involved
    1. Name
      No. 6 fuel oil and heavy crude oil
      Involved Quantity
      1192405 lt
      Potential Quantity
      59620236 lt
    Initiating EventCritical EventMajor Event
    Component (Structural): Complete collapse
    The storage tanks of crude and No. 6 oil were destroyed.
    Release: Liquid release to ground
    9,000 barrels of oil were pooled in the areas of the massive berms.
    Release: Liquid release to water body
    1,000 barrels of oil have overflowed the containment area, flowing into the waters of Limetree Bay.
    Dispersion: Substance in / on water
    Oil flowed into the HOVIC harbour. Fortunately, due to natural wind and wave action, the oil remained within the narrow harbor limits, pressed against the shoreline.

Weather Conditions

Description
Natural wind and wave action pressed the oil against the shoreline, thus containing the oil within the narrow tanker harbor limits.

Emergency Response

Response Planning
Emergency response plan takes Natech events into consideration: Yes
Emergency response plan is sufficient in taking Natech events into consideration: Yes
Response Planning Activities
The HOVIC facility was designed to provide excellent containment and recovery opportunities, given normal weather conditions.
Difficulties in Response to the Natural Hazard
Insufficient personnel and equipment to respond to both emergencies: No
Natech event prevents access of personnel to natural hazard affected area: No
Natech event prevents efficient operation of personnel in the natural hazard affected area: No
Difficulties in Response to the Natech Event
Insufficient personnel and equipment to respond to both emergencies: No
Response Teams and Equipment Involved
On-site hazmat team
Response to the Natech Event
Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corporation (HOVIC) employees had already begun countermeasures to contain the oil.

HOVIC and U.S. Coast Guard Atlantic Area Strike Team (LAST) personnel were employed to the response procedures. They had quickly placed two thousand feet of of 24 inch skirt boom disposed on two layers between the piers at HOVIC's harbor to contain the spill. Then, they tried to use skimming pumps but were not successful. Therefore an alternative clean-up technique was used. Oil-snare absorbent was applied to the boomed oil after which it was recovered by clamshell buckets. The buckets were used to lift the oil into a temporary earthen sump onshore.

Consequences

Human Health Impacts
Symptoms of distress due to oil exposure, including exaggerated preening behavior and tremors, were observed.
Environmental Zones Impacted
Off-shore (e.g. estuary, sea)
Environmental Impacts
- Approximately 1,000 barrels entered into the water.
- Three miles of sand beaches were heavily oiled as deep as two feet in some places.
- No significant amounts of oil were observed adhering to living coral reefs.
- Localized mortalities were observed in crustaceans and other small animals in the littoral zone.
- Lightly oiled seabirds were observed, which were seen to be capable of flight.
- No dead fish or animals were reported.
- Tarballs have continued to appear to the shoreline four months after the incident.
Community Disruption
For humanitarian reasons, prisoners allegedly released and roamed about the island freely, adding to social disruption and posing a physical security threat to response personnel.

Remedial Activities

Decontamination Activities
- All of the oiled solids, with the exception of the contaminated sands, were transported by barge to
Puerto Rico and disposed of in an authorized landfill.

- The 30,000 cubic yards of contaminated sand were collected in seven temporary storage fields. A plan was approved to remove the oiled sand to an approved St. Croix landfill. The oiled sand would be treated by incineration and made available for use in producing asphalt for road construction.
Restoration Activities
HOVIC was able to recover the majority of the oil discharged (almost all of the 1,000 barrels) at its facility and return it to one of its oil recovery tanks.

Lessons Learned

Lessons Learned on Equipment
- Skimming pumps were not successful in recovering the oil at HOVIC due to the high pour point of the oil.

- Many island's infrastructure, such as potable water, electricity, and sanitation facilities, were also destroyed by the hurricane and hampered response efforts. Thus, mobile satellite communications were critical to the success of the response.
Lessons Learned on Organisational Aspects
- HOVIC pollution response personnel took effective measures to contain their oil spill immediately following the passage of the hurricane.

- Based on an overflight of St. Croix by MSO San Juan investigators on Wednesday morning (20 September), it was difficult to distinguish from the air the oil spill from the earthen base around the tank. Later on that day, it was reported by Coast Guard cutters on the scene that a potential major oil spill in Christiansted began reaching the Coast Guard in San Juan.

- For humanitarian reasons, prisoners allegedly released and roamed about the island freely, adding to social disruption and posing a physical security threat to response personnel. Adequate physical security must be provided for pollution responders, with particular care given to potentially vulnerable targets such as contractor finance personnel maintaining large payrolls on the scene.

-The Oil Pollution Act of 1990, signed into law on August 18, 1990, is expected to result in implementing regulations which will enhance federal response capabilities by authorizing the OSC to access the new Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund (Oil Fund) for discharges that, previously, may have been
excluded.

- Industry and government will continue to work toward preventing a super-catastrophic discharge, as worst-case scenarios and contingency planning may be exceeded.
Lessons Learned on Mitigation Measures
Political pressure to emphasize activities of beach cleanup crews may have interfered with the discharge and containing and recovering all floating oil.
Lessons Learned on Emergency Response Aspects
- With Puerto Rico about 1,500 miles away from the Coast Guard AtLantic Area Strike Team (LAST) headquarters in Mobile, an immediate expertise is generally not able to arrive on scene in the Caribbean for about 24 hours. In this particular response, it was just about 24 hours from the time LAST members were requested until they arrived in San Juan in the late afternoon of September 21.

- The expertise and equipment provided by LAST members were essential in securing the source of the discharge, deploying containment booms, recovering much of the floating oil, and supervising the activities of the clean-up contractor.
ID: 55, Created: Vincenzo ARCIDIACONO, 2014-09-19 16:56:00 – Last Updated: Kyriaki GKOKTSI, 2023-10-17 10:49:48

Attachments

NoDescriptionFile Size
1.MAJOR OIL SPILLS CAUSED BY HURRICANE HUGO, ST. CROIX, U.S. VIRGIN ISLAND 1.20MB
2.Oil Spill Case Histories 1.73MB