Natech Accident
DISCLAIMER: The Joint Research Centre does not guarantee the accuracy and completeness of the data in eNatech. It also reserves the right to cancel or change records without prior notification.
Type
Natech Accident
Date
1999/08/17
Status
Published

Units Involved

  1. Name
    Storage Tanks 1,2,3
    Type
    Storage: Atmospheric storage tank
    Description
    Due to the earthquake, the roof of one tank (ST1) was ruptured whereas the other two tanks (ST2, ST3) suffered pipe breaking at their base.

Event Sequences

  1. Name
    Acrylonitile Spill
    Unit
    1. Storage Tanks 1,2,3
    Description
    AN was released into the containment dikes around the tanks with base pipe damage (ST2, ST3) and to the atmosphere from the tank with roof damage (ST1). A significant amount of the spilled liquid AN overflowed from the containment dikes and was lost into the sea as surface run-off through the drainage channel.
    A portion of the remaining AN evaporated into the atmosphere.
    Due to the cracks created by the earthquake at the bottom of the concrete containment dikes, a considerable amount of the AN leaked into the soil and subsequently reached the underlying shallow coastal aquifer at the site.
    Substances Involved
    1. Name
      Acrylonitrile (AN)
      CAS No
      107-13-1
      Involved Quantity
      6500 ton
      Description
      Acrylonitrile, AN (CAS: 107-13-1), is a hazardous chemical that is highly flammable, toxic, hazardous to aquatic environment, and may cause cancer (European Union, 2008). The International Agency for Research on Cancer classifies it as possibly carcinogenic to humans with sufficient evidence for carcinogenicity in experimental animals (IARC, 1999).
    Initiating EventCritical EventMajor Event
    Component (Non-structural): Roof damage
    Roof rupture at one storage tank (ST1)
    Component (Structural): Pipeline break / damage
    Two tanks (ST2, ST3) suffered pipe breaking at their base
    Release: Liquid release to ground
    Approximately 6,500 ton of liquid AN were released from damaged tanks and pipes into the contaiment basin.
    Release: Liquid release to water body
    The containment basin overflowed and the majority of acrylonitrile swept into the sea.
    Release: Gas, vapour, mist, or smoke release to air
    Acrylonitirle evaporated into the air forming a large cloud.
    Contributing Factors
    Measure: Back-up power: Inappropriate
    The emergency generator of the plant, which was located close to the storage tanks, could not be operated since it was not explosion proof and the concentration of the highly flammable AN was very high in the air. Once the generator was moved to a safe distance, it was used to pump sea water for foam generation.
    Dispersion: Substance in / on ground
    Due to the cracks created by the earthquake at the bottom of the concrete containment dikes, a considerable amount of the AN leaked into the soil
    Dispersion: Substance in air
    A large portion of AN evaporated generating a large cloud that was both toxic and flammable. The AN cloud was a threat to the responder teams and to the nearby villages.
    Contributing Factors
    Equipment: Loss of process control:
    Electricity was not available and all water pipes, including the ones used for fire fighting were broken. The vapour suppression system installed to contain accidental spills could not be operated properly due to the loss of water pressure.
    Dispersion: Substance in / on water
    Majority of the spilled ACN liquid was released into the sea, whereas the rest seeped into the soil and vaporized.
    Dispersion: Substance in groundwater
    The AN leaked into the soil reached the underlying shallow coastal aquifer at the site.

Emergency Response

Difficulties in Response to the Natural Hazard
Insufficient personnel and equipment to respond to both emergencies: Yes
Difficulties in Response to the Natech Event
Insufficient personnel and equipment to respond to both emergencies: Yes
Damage to lifelines (e.g. water, power, communication, transportation): Yes
Response Teams and Equipment Involved
  • Fire fighting teams of nearby plants
  • Regional / national fire fighting teams
Sheltering and Evacuation due to the Natech event
  • On-site evacuation
  • Off-site evacuation
Response to the Natech Event
- Search and rescue operations were mainly conducted by local people, due to lack of professional search and rescue teams.
- Lack of communication also prevented health officials from receiving information about the properties of AN and treatment methods of its toxic effects from the expert of the facility.
- The general manager of the facility urgently requested special foam, sprays, pumps, and gas mask filters, which were insufficient in the facility.
- In reply to an external support request, the fire fighting team of the nearby military airport joined the mitigation operations. Fire brigades of nearby municipalities and Istanbul supplied foam and pumps.
- An evacuation order was issued by the crisis center following the pertinent request from the general manager for an evacuation area of 6 km radius around the facility due to the risk to the public health.

Consequences

On-site Injured
27
Human Health Impacts
Acute toxicity symptoms were observed in the emergency response teams and the public living in the vicinity. A number of 27 workers were reported to have been poisoned. One member of the military fighting team reportedly went into a coma, while the other were affected badly. Inhabitants of settlements in the vicinity of the facility suffered symptoms of acute toxicity, such as hoarseness, vertigo, nausea, respiratory problems, skin irritation, headache, eye and nasal irritation (S¸ enocaklı, 2003b; Aydemir, 2010b).

According to Voice of Yalova (2010), there is an alleged increase in the cancer rate due to the event. It was reported that among the 189 people who prosecuted the company after the incident, 17 had died from cancer (Aydemir, 2010a). Among the 5 members of the military fire fighting team, which responded to the spill in the first days of the incident, one reportedly died of lung cancer and another one is treated for it.
Environmental Zones Impacted
  • Inland (e.g. grassland, cropland, forest)
  • Freshwater (e.g. pond, lake, stream)
  • Off-shore (e.g. estuary, sea)
Environmental Impacts
- All animals and vegetation died inside the facility within a 200 m radius from the leaking storage tanks.
- 6500 t of AN were released into air, sea and groundwater.
- Measurements conducted at 3 sampling stations close to the facility showed that AN concentration in the seawater was 0.157-2.88 μg/l 10 days after the incident, which decreased to 0.075-0.178 μg/l after 25 days.
- During the first week from the accident, atmospheric AN concentrations of 360 ppm were measured in the vicinity of the pump and 10–30 ppm at other locations within the facility (Supreme Court, 2004).
- Acrylamide, which is a hydrolysis product of AN in the aquatic environment, was also found in the samples (G¨uven and Gezgin, 2005).
Economic Impacts
A ban was issued by the local government on the agricultural products harvested in the farms around the facility. The farm products were collected and subsequently destroyed. Production losses were reimbursed by the company, which were afterwards compensated by its insurance.
Built-up Areas Impacted
  • Public areas (e.g. schools, hospitals)
  • Utilities (e.g. gas, water, electricity, telecommunication)
Community Disruption
Due to the natural hazard conditions, the local hospitals and clinics were overcrowded with seriously injured people. Hence, they were not able to respond properly to the poisoned people and treat the symptoms adequately.
Electricity was not available and all water pipes, including the ones used for fire fighting, were broken, causing 400 t of water in the water storage tank to flow into the sea.

Remedial Activities

Decontamination Activities
During the first year of operation, the extracted ground water was treated by an on-site distillation unit and over 80 t of AN were recovered.

Afterwards, the groundwater was treated in the wastewater treatment plant of the facility to recover the low levels of AN, which could not be efficiently recovered by distillation.

The clean-up performance was optimized by continuously altering the groundwater extraction scheme, according to measurements of the AN concentration, groundwater level and rainfall.

At the end of the third year, the AN concentration had decreased from its initial level of > 80,000 mg/l to non-detectable levels and stabilized.

The pump-and-treat operation was continued for five years, resulting in the treatment of 53,000 m3 of groundwater. Monitoring studies were maintained for two more years, until September 2006 (Zanbak, 2006).
Remediation Activities
-Barriers were constructed to prevent surface run-off of the AN to the sea.
-Following the recovery of electricity after 36 hours, AN was started to be transferred from the containment dikes into intact tanks and the wastewater treatment pond. About 3000 t of AN were reported to have been collected in this way.
-Emergency response activities continued for more than one week until all spilled material was transferred to safe tanks and evaporation was prevented.
Restoration Activities
- All storage tanks were strengthened against sloshing effects and secondary roofs were constructed to minimize evaporation in case of a leak.
- Hard piping connections to the storage tanks were replaced with flexible connections.
- The ground of the containment dikes was covered with impermeable material and the dikes were reinforced.
- Foaming sprays were installed around the tanks.
- Underground water pipes that were broken during the earthquake were installed over ground.
- The capacity of emergency generators was increased and additional pumps were installed.

Lessons Learned

Lessons Learned on Equipment
- An extensive ground water pump-and-treat system for hydraulic control and product recovery was initiated after the incident.
- Eleven monitoring wells were constructed in order to determine the extent of groundwater pollution.
- Utilizing 5 additionally boreholes, AN concentration, pH, electrical conductivity and ground level measurements were started at 16 locations within the facility area in September 1999.
- Based on monitoring data, two pumping wells were installed inside the damaged tank dike and four French drain-type drainage trenches were gradually put into operation around the tank farm.
Lessons Learned on Emergency Response Aspects
Emergency response plans were reviewed and improved by taking natech scenarios into account.
ID: 5, Created: Serkan GIRGIN, 2010-12-09 17:42:58 – Last Updated: Kyriaki GKOKTSI, 2023-10-16 15:13:37

Attachments

NoDescriptionFile Size
1.G¨uven and Gezgin, 2005 295.47KB
2.Zanbak, 2006 1.66MB