JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE
eNatech- Natural-Hazard Triggered Technological Accidents Database
Home
Login
ECAS Logout
Legal Notice
Privacy Statement
Cookie policy
Contact Us
Search
en
European Commission
JRC
eNatech
Natech Accident
DISCLAIMER:
The Joint Research Centre does not guarantee the accuracy and completeness of the data in eNatech. It also reserves the right to cancel or change records without prior notification.
Type
Natech Accident
Date
1998/02/27
Natural Hazard
Landslide, Ecuador, 1998
Site
Trans-Ecuadorian Oil Pipeline, Ecuador
Status
Published
Units Involved
Name
Pipeline
Type
Transport: Pipeline
Description
The pipeline was located at 12 km from an oil terminal transporting oil from Amazonia to the pacific coast.
Name
Port wharfs
Type
Storage: Warehouse
Event Sequences
Name
Pipeline spill
Unit
1. Pipeline
Substances Involved
Name
Oil
Involved Quantity
2500 m³
Initiating Event
Critical Event
Major Event
Component (Structural): Pipeline break / damage
The landslide caused the rupture of the pipeline.
Release: Liquid release to water body
Ca. 2500 m3 of oil spilled out of the broken pipeline
Event Sequence: Explosion and Fire
Dispersion: Substance in / on water
Oil contaminated rivers and the ocean.
Name
Explosion and Fire
Unit
2. Port wharfs
Initiating Event
Critical Event
Major Event
Event Sequence: Pipeline spill
-
Fire: Unknown
The fire spread to the wharfs of the port but spared the refinery and the gas pipeline. Walls of fire as high as 10 m were observed.
Explosion: Unknown
According to testimony by witnesses, the explosion happened when the fire engulfed a propane canister shop, thereby igniting a fireball.
Contributing Factors
Measure: Emergency water systems:
Unavailable
The rescue operations were hampered by a water shortage following the rupture of pipelines.
Emergency Response
Response to the Natech Event
The rescue operations lasted 6 hours and were complicated by water shortage following the rupture of pipelines.
Consequences
On-site Fatalities
7
On-site Injured
110
Human Health Impacts
40 people injured suffered 50% burns. Another 40 people were reported missing and 600 people were evacuated.
Community Disruption
624 people were rendered homeless.
Lessons Learned
Lessons Learned on Organisational Aspects
The laying of pipelines in areas with potentially unstable soil should be avoided, where possible.
Lessons Learned on Mitigation Measures
In general, pipelines should be fitted with adequate mechanical protection coupled with stress monitoring to mitigate the impact of slow landslides. No mitigation measures for the impact of rapid, catastrophic landslides on pipelines exist. In this case, only costly pipeline relocation or slope stabilisation can mitigate the risk.
ID: 38, Created: Bogdan DORNEANU, 2014-02-17 10:43:09 – Last Updated: Amos NECCI, 2021-01-04 18:28:27
Created: Bogdan DORNEANU, 2014-02-17 10:43:09
Updated: Bogdan DORNEANU, 2014-02-17 11:36:45
Updated: Bogdan DORNEANU, 2014-02-17 11:45:25
Updated: Bogdan DORNEANU, 2014-02-17 11:51:03
Updated: Elisabeth KRAUSMANN, 2014-07-07 12:46:09
Updated: Elisabeth KRAUSMANN, 2014-07-07 12:46:44
Updated: Elisabeth KRAUSMANN, 2014-07-07 12:52:09
Updated: Elisabeth KRAUSMANN, 2014-07-07 12:53:35
Updated: Elisabeth KRAUSMANN, 2014-07-07 12:54:07
Updated: Elisabeth KRAUSMANN, 2014-07-07 12:59:42
Updated: Amos NECCI, 2021-01-04 18:28:27
Attachments
No
Description
File Size
1.
Aria 12507, French Ministry of Sustainable Development
537.60KB
2.
Los Angeles Times
62.71KB