Login
Login
ECAS Logout
ECAS Logout
eNatech - Natural-Hazard Triggered Technological Accidents Database
Natech Accident
Menu
Close
Menu
Back
Previous items
Next items
JRC
eNatech
Info
Contact
Accessibility
DISCLAIMER:
The Joint Research Centre does not guarantee the accuracy and completeness of the data in eNatech. It also reserves the right to cancel or change records without prior notification.
Type
Natech Accident
Date
1993/01/05
Time
11:19
Natural Hazard
Storm, United Kingdom, 1993
Site ID
MV Braer crude oil tanker, United Kingdom
Status
Published
Units Involved
Name
Fuel pipeline on deck
Type
Auxiliary: Pipes and pipework
Name
Auxiliary boiler
Type
Process: Boiler
Description
The auxiliary boiler provided steam to pre-heat the heavy oil used to run the main engine. The auxiliary boiler was running on diesel oil.
Name
Main engine
Type
Auxiliary: Other
Description
Whilst at sea, the main engine was running on heavy oil, which was pre-heated with the steam produced by the the auxiliary boiler.
When manoeuvring or in restricted water, the main engine was running on lighter diesel fuel.
Name
Generator
Type
Other: Other
Description
The generator was running on diesel oil.
Name
Tanker
Type
Other: Other
Description
The tanker (en route from Mongstad, Norway to Quebec, Canada) was laden with 85,000 tonnes of Norwegian Gullfaks crude oil
Event Sequences
Name
Oil spill
Unit
5. Tanker
Description
In January 1993, the crude oil tanker tanker MV Braer ran aground during a storm off Shetland, Scotland. It broke up nearly a week later during the most intense extratropical cyclone on record for the northern Atlantic Ocean (the Braer Storm of January 1993).
Some hours earlier, the tanker had lost engine power due to a series of mechanical defects, which resulted in loss of the ship's control by the crew during the storm.
The immediate cause of the accident was the seawater contamination of the diesel oil supply (according to the official report by the Marine Accident Investigation Branch).
Substances Involved
Name
Gulfaks crude oil
Involved Quantity
85000 ton
Description
Gulfaks crude is lighter, more easily dispersible and more biodegradable than other North Sea crude oils. It has higher percentage of volatile compounds.
Initiating Event
Critical Event
Major Event
Lifeline: Other
At 11:19, the the crude oil tanker tanker MV Braer ran aground at Garths Ness during a storm off Shetland, Scotland.
Contributing Factors
Equipment: Component failure:
Under severe weather conditions in the morning of 4 January, a fuel pipeline on the deck broke loose at four steel pipe sections, allowing seawater to enter the vessel's bunker tanks via broken air vents. As a result, the ship's heavy fuel oil was contaminated with seawater, which made the engine to stop and caused the failure of the main generator at 4:40 am (on 5 January).
At 05:19 am (on 5 January), Lerwick coastguard were advised that the tanker had lost engine power, but it was not in immediate danger.
Equipment: Component malfunction:
In the evening of January 4, the main engine had been temporarily switched to lighter diesel fuel due to a problem with the auxiliary boiler after routine adjustments, which was experiencing difficulties in re-igniting (the use of an auxiliary boiler was needed to pre-heat the heavy oil, which was used to run the main engine).
Release: Liquid release to water body
Oil was seen to flow out into the sea from the moment of impact. By the following morning the bay was full of oil and the slick was spreading north and south from the bay along the Shetland coast.
Dispersion: Substance in / on water
The ship was hard aground in Quendale Bay. Exposed to the south west gale, it was raging and bumping heavily. It suffered damage and finally broke down on January 11th (most of it disappeared beneath the surface), leading to a catastrophic oil spill.
Weather Conditions
Description
West tidal stream
Emergency Response
Response Planning Activities
Various local organisations, involved in the wildlife aspects of a large oil spill, had planned how to cope with such events.
Response Teams and Equipment Involved
Regional / national hazmat teams
Sheltering and Evacuation due to the Natech event
On-site evacuation
Off-site evacuation
Response to the Natech Event
1. EVACUATION
- Non-essential personnel (14 out of the 34 crew members) were initially removed from the vessel by the coastguard helicopter from Sumburgh at 08:25.
- At 08:50, in fear that the ship would run aground near Horse Island and drawing from a similar past experience, the coastguard persuaded the Captain to abandon the tanker. It was decided to attempt its tow and the anchor handling vessel Star Sirius arrived to the scene.
- Following a communication loss between the local police and the coastguards, the master and some personnel were put back on board the vessel, who were finally rescued by the helicopter at 11:19, when the vessel was confirmed to be grounded.
- Evacuation of residents from housing in the area was not put into action, but it was under consideration if pollution levels became too high.
- The area around Quendale beach was closed off in fear that the oil could set off an explosion.
2. COORDINATION AND MONITORING
- A Joint Response Centre made up of local councillors, managers, environmentalists and technicians was set up.
- Aircraft were immediately ordered to monitor the spread of the oil. During the first few days of the spill, efforts were concentrated in the south-west Mainland. Due to the northward spread of the oil up the west side by 12 January, surveys had been extended to cover the longer stretches of accessible coastline. All accessible beaches were checked during the course of the spill.
- A wildlife response command centre was set up to direct all activities relating to wildlife affected by the spill.
- An Ecological Steering Group was established by 26 January to co-ordinate the environmental assessment, focusing on human health, economic and ecological issues.
3. VOLUNTEERING
- Several "walk-in" helpers came from outside Shetland to helped out both on beaches and in key duties. Beaches were checked by the volunteers at least twice per day to collect all dead and any live birds and animals from accessible beaches.
4. DESIGNATION ACT
A designation under section 2 of the Protection of Wrecks Act was made on 5 February 1993, to designate the wreck as dangerous due to the presence of the oil. The designation was revoked on 7 October 1994 following dispersal of the oil.
5. OTHER MEASURES
- In the aftermath of this accident, the Government decided to set up an Independent Inquiry to advise on potential further measures to protect UK coastline from pollution from merchant shipping.
- The Government convened a meeting of national and international organisations responsible for tanker operations globally.
- The Code "Interim Voluntary Code - Routeing in UK waters for Ships carrying Oil and other Hazardous Cargoes in Bulk" was adopted by IMA in November 1993.
- The Government commissioned a survey to establish the availability of salvage resources to assist a disabled tanker off the coast of the UK.
- Internationally, the new International Maritime Organisation (IMO) Regulations for the construction of oil tankers will significantly contribute to the prevention of pollution.
Consequences
Environmental Zones Impacted
Shore (e.g. beach, dune, marsh land)
Off-shore (e.g. estuary, sea)
Environmental Impacts
Compared with typical North Sea oil, the Gulfaks crude oil properties (i.e., lighter, easily dispersible, and more biodegradable) prevented the event from having greater impacts on the shore. However, the higher percentage of volatile compounds may relate to the high rate of respiratory distress noted in seals in the area.
The total number of dead birds recovered from beaches during January was 1,538. The (Ecological) Steering Group published an interim (1993) and a final report (1994) on the monitoring strategy and methods. They concluded that although there were local and limited adverse effects, the overall impact of the spill had been minimal.
Remedial Activities
Decontamination Activities
Aircraft were immediately ordered to spray chemical dispersants on the oil, which started on day two.
Remediation Activities
A Greenpeace ship arrived in Shetland on day two with facilities to help mammals and birds affected by the oil spill. 23,000 sheep were removed from the area.
Lessons Learned
Lessons Learned on Organisational Aspects
- Corrective actions should be made immediately when mechanical defects (e.g., broken loose pipes, compromised integrity of fuel oil system) are observed, as they can be related to a hazardous situation.
- Float seal valves should remain operational and efficient at all times, a matter of great importance that should not be underestimated.
Lessons Learned on Emergency Response Aspects
-Alternative methods of dispersing the oil, such as mechanical methods or burning, were considered, but they were rejected because they were thought to be ineffective in the bad weather or dangerous.
-In any oil spill, it is difficult to estimate the proportion of the actual mortality found on beach surveys, and several factors made that even harder in this case, i.e., shorelines could not be searched thoroughly due to persistent storms neither the winds enabled the catching of live birds, while the weather also prevented systematic searches of the islands.
ID: 133, Created: Kyriaki GKOKTSI, 2025-01-29 17:15:52 – Last Updated: Kyriaki GKOKTSI, 2025-01-31 11:55:49
Created: Kyriaki GKOKTSI, 2025-01-29 17:15:52
Updated: Kyriaki GKOKTSI, 2025-01-29 17:22:22
Updated: Kyriaki GKOKTSI, 2025-01-29 17:32:42
Updated: Kyriaki GKOKTSI, 2025-01-29 17:47:33
Updated: Kyriaki GKOKTSI, 2025-01-30 14:12:39
Updated: Kyriaki GKOKTSI, 2025-01-30 14:17:02
Updated: Kyriaki GKOKTSI, 2025-01-30 14:17:59
Updated: Kyriaki GKOKTSI, 2025-01-30 14:20:25
Updated: Kyriaki GKOKTSI, 2025-01-30 14:36:53
Updated: Kyriaki GKOKTSI, 2025-01-30 14:39:51
Updated: Kyriaki GKOKTSI, 2025-01-30 14:42:01
Updated: Kyriaki GKOKTSI, 2025-01-30 14:46:20
Updated: Kyriaki GKOKTSI, 2025-01-30 14:54:23
Updated: Kyriaki GKOKTSI, 2025-01-31 10:19:14
Updated: Kyriaki GKOKTSI, 2025-01-31 10:28:53
Updated: Kyriaki GKOKTSI, 2025-01-31 10:34:21
Updated: Kyriaki GKOKTSI, 2025-01-31 10:37:35
Updated: Kyriaki GKOKTSI, 2025-01-31 11:01:27
Updated: Kyriaki GKOKTSI, 2025-01-31 11:09:17
Updated: Kyriaki GKOKTSI, 2025-01-31 11:12:36
Updated: Kyriaki GKOKTSI, 2025-01-31 11:14:46
Updated: Kyriaki GKOKTSI, 2025-01-31 11:17:49
Updated: Kyriaki GKOKTSI, 2025-01-31 11:25:35
Updated: Kyriaki GKOKTSI, 2025-01-31 11:32:17
Updated: Kyriaki GKOKTSI, 2025-01-31 11:33:30
Updated: Kyriaki GKOKTSI, 2025-01-31 11:35:31
Updated: Kyriaki GKOKTSI, 2025-01-31 11:49:51
Updated: Kyriaki GKOKTSI, 2025-01-31 11:55:49
Attachments
No
Description
File Size
1.
Click here to select record
Accident investigation report
2.83MB
2.
Click here to select record
Accident investigation report photographs
496.91KB
3.
Click here to select record
Article - Scottish shipwrecks
13.06MB
4.
Click here to select record
News article
9.99MB
5.
Click here to select record
Wikipedia
1.01MB