eNatech - Natural-Hazard Triggered Technological Accidents Database
Natech Accident
DISCLAIMER: The Joint Research Centre does not guarantee the accuracy and completeness of the data in eNatech. It also reserves the right to cancel or change records without prior notification.
Natech Accident
1993/01/05
11:19
Published

Units Involved

  1. Fuel pipeline on deck
    Auxiliary: Pipes and pipework
  2. Auxiliary boiler
    Process: Boiler
    The auxiliary boiler provided steam to pre-heat the heavy oil used to run the main engine. The auxiliary boiler was running on diesel oil.
  3. Main engine
    Auxiliary: Other
    Whilst at sea, the main engine was running on heavy oil, which was pre-heated with the steam produced by the the auxiliary boiler.
    When manoeuvring or in restricted water, the main engine was running on lighter diesel fuel.
  4. Generator
    Other: Other
    The generator was running on diesel oil.
  5. Tanker
    Other: Other
    The tanker (en route from Mongstad, Norway to Quebec, Canada) was laden with 85,000 tonnes of Norwegian Gullfaks crude oil

Event Sequences

  1. Oil spill
    5. Tanker
    In January 1993, the crude oil tanker tanker MV Braer ran aground during a storm off Shetland, Scotland. It broke up nearly a week later during the most intense extratropical cyclone on record for the northern Atlantic Ocean (the Braer Storm of January 1993).

    Some hours earlier, the tanker had lost engine power due to a series of mechanical defects, which resulted in loss of the ship's control by the crew during the storm.

    The immediate cause of the accident was the seawater contamination of the diesel oil supply (according to the official report by the Marine Accident Investigation Branch).
    1. Gulfaks crude oil
      85000 ton
      Gulfaks crude is lighter, more easily dispersible and more biodegradable than other North Sea crude oils. It has higher percentage of volatile compounds.
    Initiating EventCritical EventMajor Event
    Lifeline: Other
    At 11:19, the the crude oil tanker tanker MV Braer ran aground at Garths Ness during a storm off Shetland, Scotland.
    Contributing Factors
    Equipment: Component failure:
    Under severe weather conditions in the morning of 4 January, a fuel pipeline on the deck broke loose at four steel pipe sections, allowing seawater to enter the vessel's bunker tanks via broken air vents. As a result, the ship's heavy fuel oil was contaminated with seawater, which made the engine to stop and caused the failure of the main generator at 4:40 am (on 5 January).

    At 05:19 am (on 5 January), Lerwick coastguard were advised that the tanker had lost engine power, but it was not in immediate danger.
    Equipment: Component malfunction:
    In the evening of January 4, the main engine had been temporarily switched to lighter diesel fuel due to a problem with the auxiliary boiler after routine adjustments, which was experiencing difficulties in re-igniting (the use of an auxiliary boiler was needed to pre-heat the heavy oil, which was used to run the main engine).
    Release: Liquid release to water body
    Oil was seen to flow out into the sea from the moment of impact. By the following morning the bay was full of oil and the slick was spreading north and south from the bay along the Shetland coast.
    Dispersion: Substance in / on water
    The ship was hard aground in Quendale Bay. Exposed to the south west gale, it was raging and bumping heavily. It suffered damage and finally broke down on January 11th (most of it disappeared beneath the surface), leading to a catastrophic oil spill.

Weather Conditions

West tidal stream

Emergency Response

Various local organisations, involved in the wildlife aspects of a large oil spill, had planned how to cope with such events.
Regional / national hazmat teams
  • On-site evacuation
  • Off-site evacuation
1. EVACUATION
- Non-essential personnel (14 out of the 34 crew members) were initially removed from the vessel by the coastguard helicopter from Sumburgh at 08:25.
- At 08:50, in fear that the ship would run aground near Horse Island and drawing from a similar past experience, the coastguard persuaded the Captain to abandon the tanker. It was decided to attempt its tow and the anchor handling vessel Star Sirius arrived to the scene.
- Following a communication loss between the local police and the coastguards, the master and some personnel were put back on board the vessel, who were finally rescued by the helicopter at 11:19, when the vessel was confirmed to be grounded.
- Evacuation of residents from housing in the area was not put into action, but it was under consideration if pollution levels became too high.
- The area around Quendale beach was closed off in fear that the oil could set off an explosion.

2. COORDINATION AND MONITORING
- A Joint Response Centre made up of local councillors, managers, environmentalists and technicians was set up.
- Aircraft were immediately ordered to monitor the spread of the oil. During the first few days of the spill, efforts were concentrated in the south-west Mainland. Due to the northward spread of the oil up the west side by 12 January, surveys had been extended to cover the longer stretches of accessible coastline. All accessible beaches were checked during the course of the spill.
- A wildlife response command centre was set up to direct all activities relating to wildlife affected by the spill.
- An Ecological Steering Group was established by 26 January to co-ordinate the environmental assessment, focusing on human health, economic and ecological issues.

3. VOLUNTEERING
- Several "walk-in" helpers came from outside Shetland to helped out both on beaches and in key duties. Beaches were checked by the volunteers at least twice per day to collect all dead and any live birds and animals from accessible beaches.

4. DESIGNATION ACT
A designation under section 2 of the Protection of Wrecks Act was made on 5 February 1993, to designate the wreck as dangerous due to the presence of the oil. The designation was revoked on 7 October 1994 following dispersal of the oil.

5. OTHER MEASURES
- In the aftermath of this accident, the Government decided to set up an Independent Inquiry to advise on potential further measures to protect UK coastline from pollution from merchant shipping.
- The Government convened a meeting of national and international organisations responsible for tanker operations globally.
- The Code "Interim Voluntary Code - Routeing in UK waters for Ships carrying Oil and other Hazardous Cargoes in Bulk" was adopted by IMA in November 1993.
- The Government commissioned a survey to establish the availability of salvage resources to assist a disabled tanker off the coast of the UK.
- Internationally, the new International Maritime Organisation (IMO) Regulations for the construction of oil tankers will significantly contribute to the prevention of pollution.

Consequences

  • Shore (e.g. beach, dune, marsh land)
  • Off-shore (e.g. estuary, sea)
Compared with typical North Sea oil, the Gulfaks crude oil properties (i.e., lighter, easily dispersible, and more biodegradable) prevented the event from having greater impacts on the shore. However, the higher percentage of volatile compounds may relate to the high rate of respiratory distress noted in seals in the area.

The total number of dead birds recovered from beaches during January was 1,538. The (Ecological) Steering Group published an interim (1993) and a final report (1994) on the monitoring strategy and methods. They concluded that although there were local and limited adverse effects, the overall impact of the spill had been minimal.

Remedial Activities

Aircraft were immediately ordered to spray chemical dispersants on the oil, which started on day two.
A Greenpeace ship arrived in Shetland on day two with facilities to help mammals and birds affected by the oil spill. 23,000 sheep were removed from the area.

Lessons Learned

- Corrective actions should be made immediately when mechanical defects (e.g., broken loose pipes, compromised integrity of fuel oil system) are observed, as they can be related to a hazardous situation.

- Float seal valves should remain operational and efficient at all times, a matter of great importance that should not be underestimated.
-Alternative methods of dispersing the oil, such as mechanical methods or burning, were considered, but they were rejected because they were thought to be ineffective in the bad weather or dangerous.
-In any oil spill, it is difficult to estimate the proportion of the actual mortality found on beach surveys, and several factors made that even harder in this case, i.e., shorelines could not be searched thoroughly due to persistent storms neither the winds enabled the catching of live birds, while the weather also prevented systematic searches of the islands.
ID: 133, Created: Kyriaki GKOKTSI, 2025-01-29 17:15:52 – Last Updated: Kyriaki GKOKTSI, 2025-01-31 11:55:49

Attachments

NoDescriptionFile Size
1.Click here to select record Accident investigation report2.83MB
2.Click here to select record Accident investigation report photographs496.91KB
3.Click here to select record Article - Scottish shipwrecks13.06MB
4.Click here to select record News article9.99MB
5.Click here to select record Wikipedia1.01MB